Warning: Parameter 1 to wp_default_scripts() expected to be a reference, value given in /homepages/37/d387714646/htdocs/open/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 579

Warning: Parameter 1 to wp_default_styles() expected to be a reference, value given in /homepages/37/d387714646/htdocs/open/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 579

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/37/d387714646/htdocs/open/wp-includes/plugin.php:579) in /homepages/37/d387714646/htdocs/open/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments for EvalYear.com http://evalyear.com 2015: A year for visualizing Evaluation Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:59:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.3.15 Comment on Bad (and Good) evaluation by Deb Bialeschki http://evalyear.com/project/goodandbadevaluation/#comment-12 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:59:32 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=96#comment-12 Hope my email got to you too- First, Thanks! and I wondered how to cite this PDF if you are OK with me including some/all of it in a revision of our evaluation book we are working on. Just let me know what you think- Deb Bialeschki (dbialeschki@acacamps.org)

]]>
Comment on Bad (and Good) evaluation by Sara Vaca http://evalyear.com/project/goodandbadevaluation/#comment-11 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:47:27 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=96#comment-11 sure thing! sent to your email, Deb.

]]>
Comment on Bad (and Good) evaluation by Deb Bialeschki http://evalyear.com/project/goodandbadevaluation/#comment-8 Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:37:11 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=96#comment-8 is this available as a PDF?

]]>
Comment on Ethics’ iceberg by Sara Vaca http://evalyear.com/project/ethicsiceberg/#comment-7 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:26:20 +0000 http://evalyear.com/?page_id=107#comment-7 Thanks Briana, you got it!
Let us know if eventually there would be any other… ;-P

]]>
Comment on Ethics’ iceberg by Briana http://evalyear.com/project/ethicsiceberg/#comment-6 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:53:00 +0000 http://evalyear.com/?page_id=107#comment-6 I love the graphics and think that this is a great resource, as well as a great way to start a dialogue with stakeholders (particularly for internal evaluators). Would it be possible to get a cleaned up version, without the typos/misspellings (e.g. “honestity”)? Thank you for your awesome work!

]]>
Comment on Bad (and Good) evaluation by Sara Vaca http://evalyear.com/project/goodandbadevaluation/#comment-5 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 13:31:22 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=96#comment-5 Many thanks, Bethany!

]]>
Comment on EvalMap by Joseph Barnes http://evalyear.com/project/evalmap/#comment-4 Sun, 07 Jun 2015 19:50:33 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=15#comment-4 Thanks for your comment Bethany. The symbols are just a direct copy of the London Underground map upon which this is based, so do not mean anything else. There is a logic to the lines, however, and I agree that a key would be beneficial – we will add this to the list of things to revise when we get a chance.

]]>
Comment on EvalMap by Bethany Laursen http://evalyear.com/project/evalmap/#comment-3 Sun, 07 Jun 2015 15:39:52 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=15#comment-3 This is intriguing, but I keep wondering if there is any meaning in the different symbols and colors. It would help to have a legend.

]]>
Comment on Bad (and Good) evaluation by Bethany Laursen http://evalyear.com/project/goodandbadevaluation/#comment-2 Sun, 07 Jun 2015 15:33:19 +0000 http://open.impactready.org/?page_id=96#comment-2 Love this!! I will share widely.

]]>